Article Title:Euthanasia: Going Nowhere?
Category:Comment
Author or Credit:Craig Young
Published on:27th September 2010 - 10:18 am
Published by:GayNZ.com
Internet Archive link:https://web.archive.org/web/20170423044601/http://www.gaynz.com/articles/publish/31/article_9395.php
NDHA link:http://ndhadeliver.natlib.govt.nz/ArcAggregator/arcView/frameView/IE3535607/http://www.gaynz.com/articles/publish/31/article_9395.php
Note that the National Library of New Zealand (NDHA) website uses both cookies and frames. The first time you click on a link it first may take you to the archived front page of gaynz.com. Close the window and try again. This is because the NDHA website uses cookies and you cannot access an indiviual page without visiting the front page first
Story ID:9395
Text:Across the Tasman, the euthanasia debate seems to be rumbling back into life again...as if it ever subsided in the first place. Still, there will probably be no real progress. Why? Put simply, it's a lesson in social movement arithmetic. Social movements may attract mass support, but they only gain legislative traction if they pay heed to amenable social scientists and medical practitioners and evidence-based research substantiates their case. In the case of the euthanasia reform lobby, the Australian (and New Zealand) Medical Associations are implacably opposed to decriminalisation of voluntary euthanasia. In those international instances where decriminalisation has occurred, medical practitioners have either declared neutrality or adopted protocols, practices and procedures to regulate the process of voluntary euthanasia. Without that neutrality or practical support, the euthanasia reform lobby will experience opposition from an influential source of professional evidence-based research and opinion. Until that subsides, their task is pointless. Added to which, there's another factor that militates against their ultimate success. The reform movement is divided between two factions. One of them is committed to legislative reform and regulated access to voluntary euthanasia or physician assisted suicide. The other is more inclined toward illegal provision of 'suicide drugs' like Nembutal, imported from Mexico. It isn't an issue that particularly raises interest amongst lesbians and gay men, not even PLWAs or breast cancer survivors. For the most part, they seem to be far more concerned with procuring access to palliative pharmaceuticals through Pharmac and Medsafe's sometimes glacial approval processes. Still, these pharmaceuticals prolong life and enable active citizenship and working lives, as opposed to loss of autonomy and dependency. In those circumstances where it has arisen in the context of gay men's lives, it is either historical, as in the context of Ray Gosling's false admission that he had assisted the suicide of a suffering PLWA; or in the context of other health issues than HIV/AIDS, as with a gay couple who availed themselves of the Dignitas assisted suicide clinic in Zurich, in the context of pancreatic cancer. Oddly enough, lesbians seem to be absent from the euthanasia debate. Straight women are active participants, and in several cases across the western world, female protagonists have taken the initiative in striving for reform. However, they all seem to have been straight women, sometimes with gay male friends (like Canada's Sue Rodriguez and former New Democrat MP Svend Robinson, or Britain's Dr Anne Turner and her gay son Edward). There seems to be no reason why this should be the case, given that lesbians suffer the same age-related infirmities and life-threatening medical conditions as their straight counterparts. It's not difficult to see the sense in Julia Gillard's obvious strategy in allowing the reopening of the debate. Liberal Leader of the Opposition Tony Abbott is a diehard conservative Catholic on this and many other issues. Unlike the others, though, this has the potential to drive a wedge between Abbott and more moderate Australians, given strong public support for voluntary euthanasia and physician assisted suicide. It may not end up neccessarily resulting in legislative reform, although it will weaken the influence of the Australian Christian Right on this front. With any luck, it may erode their standing on issues of greater import to our Australian counterparts, like the federal same-sex marriage ban. Recommended: Exit International: http://www.exitinternational.net/ Dignity New Zealand: http://www.dignitynz.org.nz Not Recommended: Right to Life Australia: http://www.righttolife.com.au Craig Young - 27th September 2010    
Disclaimer:This page displays a version of the GayNZ.com article with all formatting and images removed. It was harvested automatically and some text content may not have been fully captured correctly: access this content at your own risk. A copy of the full article is available (off-line) at the Lesbian and Gay Archives of New Zealand. This online version is provided for personal research and review and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of PrideNZ.com. If you have queries or concerns about this article please email us
Reproduction note:Just before GayNZ.com closed in May 2017, the website owners wrote this article about reproducing content from the website: "our work has always been available for glbti people to use and all we ask is that you not plagiarise it... if you use it anywhere please attribute it to GayNZ.com and where there is an authors name attached please acknowledge that writer."