Article Title:Analysis: Thatcher's Unquiet Ghost?
Author or Credit:Craig Young
Published on:7th May 2010 - 07:48 pm
NDHA link:
Note that the National Library of New Zealand (NDHA) website uses both cookies and frames. The first time you click on a link it first may take you to the archived front page of Close the window and try again. This is because the NDHA website uses cookies and you cannot access an indiviual page without visiting the front page first
Story ID:8777
Text:David Cameron As predicted, the British Conservative Party has failed to win enough seats at its general election, leaving a hung parliament and the Liberal Democrats installed as kingmakers. What does this mean for LGBT communities there? Why were the Tories denied outright victory? One does feel sorry for David Cameron, the Tory leader, whose centre-right social liberalism modernised his party's frontbeach- but as we can now plainly see, there were limits to the depth and scale of that modernisation. Indeed, Tory peer Lord David Ashcroft and fundamentalist Christian party donors, as well as extremist social conservative electoral candidates, may have been responsible for the Conservative pyrrhic 'victory'. They couldn't shut up for the good of the party and may have doomed it to opposition for another five years, if not longer. No doubt in depth exit polling will find other causes, but one of them certainly seems to have been their adverse contribution, as well as accomodation of Tory Eurosceptics and damage to European Union centre-right collegiality with Merkel's CDU and Nicholas Sarkozy's centre-right administration. It may have also added further questions about the depth and scope of internal Tory reform. Cameron leads a divided party. He ran a strong campaign, but in the end, his predecessor Margaret Thatcher haunted the Tories. She provides potent and recent memories of social exclusion, divisiveness, social inequality and government repression. She may have cursed her successors through the blighted memories of the eighties and the instability of the nineties, when she deliberately undermined her successor, John Major. He can console himself with Gordon Brown's probable resignation, if that is the price of a Labour/Liberal Democrat coalition. As for naysayers, they conveniently forget Welsh and Scottish Labour/Liberal Democrat coalitions under their proportional representation, devolved assemblies. And the prospect of securing their cherished goals of electoral and constitutional reform, and locking the Tories out of power until more comprehensive reform has occurred, may be too tempting for the Liberal Democrats. As for British LGBT communities, if there is a Labour/Liberal Democrat coalition as a consequence of this hung parliament, then one happy outcome might well be a written constitution and equality rights provisions that would include that country's LGBT communities and other human rights and civil liberties guarantees, as well as the Single Transferable Vote as a far superior proportional representation electoral system to Britain's First Past the Post electoral system, one of the probable casualties of the result today. Craig Young - 7th May 2010    
Disclaimer:This page displays a version of the article with all formatting and images removed. It was harvested automatically and some text content may not have been fully captured correctly: access this content at your own risk. A copy of the full article is available (off-line) at the Lesbian and Gay Archives of New Zealand. This online version is provided for personal research and review and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of If you have queries or concerns about this article please email us
Reproduction note:Just before closed in May 2017, the website owners wrote this article about reproducing content from the website: "our work has always been available for glbti people to use and all we ask is that you not plagiarise it... if you use it anywhere please attribute it to and where there is an authors name attached please acknowledge that writer."