Article Title:France: False Universals?
Author or Credit:Craig Young
Published on:24th October 2009 - 12:11 am
NDHA link:
Note that the National Library of New Zealand (NDHA) website uses both cookies and frames. The first time you click on a link it first may take you to the archived front page of Close the window and try again. This is because the NDHA website uses cookies and you cannot access an indiviual page without visiting the front page first
Story ID:8068
Text:In France, homosexuality was decriminalised in the early nineteenth century. Why has LGBT progress been so slow? Civil republicanism. To translate that into English... France is justifiably proud of its achievements in art, culture, philosophy, fashion and politics, past and present. It expects ethnic minorities to assimilate, and its centralised institutions zealously guard the central tenets of French universalist identity, which has tended to frown on other expressions of collective identity- like organised gay communities. In some jurisdictions, it's even illegal to fly a rainbow flag! This weakened sense of alternative gay cultural and social identity and community has had some devastating results insofar as the progress of the HIV/AIDS epidemic goes. One of the most tragic costs was the premature death of Michel Foucault (1926-1984), renowned French gay philosopher. He identified weakly with collective gay identity, except in 'transgressive instances', disregarded warnings about HIV/AIDS and safe sex and then died as a result. However, Foucault never attempted a specific critical analysis of the role that French civic republican identity played in marginalising its alternatives. France decriminalised male homosexuality during the Napoleonic era, but apart from Proust, Gide and Jean Genet, gay men had to put up with police surveillance and repression, age of consent inequality, workplace and accommodation discrimination and the absence of spousal rights until the last thirty years of French LGBT activism. France is not alone in its strong centralised civic identity. In Japan, adherence to its traditional institutions and social hierarchy also impede LGBT progress, while China underwent Mao's cult of personality until the seventies, at which point it began to challenge authoritarian rural Puritanism as it rapidly industrialised, urbanised and developed metropolitan gay social networks. Moreover, China's modernisation has encouraged LGBT, religious and nationalist dissent. However, LGBT dissent can be better accommodated, as it doesn't fundamentally challenge the regime but instead wants to secure incremental goals and objectives. At some point, the Communist Party of China may even decide to open its own LGBT party units, praise LGBT entrepreneurs and adapt the Confucian emphasis on work, scholarship and family to become more inclusive. Strong centralised national and civic identities don't exactly repress LGBT rights outright. However, they do divert LGBT aspirations to private desires and not collective political and social reform. Craig Young - 24th October 2009    
Disclaimer:This page displays a version of the article with all formatting and images removed. It was harvested automatically and some text content may not have been fully captured correctly: access this content at your own risk. A copy of the full article is available (off-line) at the Lesbian and Gay Archives of New Zealand. This online version is provided for personal research and review and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of If you have queries or concerns about this article please email us
Reproduction note:Just before closed in May 2017, the website owners wrote this article about reproducing content from the website: "our work has always been available for glbti people to use and all we ask is that you not plagiarise it... if you use it anywhere please attribute it to and where there is an authors name attached please acknowledge that writer."