Article Title:Sturm not guilty of stupefying
Category:New Zealand Daily News
Author or News Staff
Published on:21st November 2003 - 12:00 pm
Story ID:2121
Text:Auckland restauranteur Philip David Sturm did not stupefy six young men, the Auckland High Court ruled yesterday, but he still faces sexual violation charges against his alleged victims. Justice Chambers said none of the four complainants were ever in a state of stupor, as he has defined the term. The four complainants allege that they engaged in non-consensual sex because they were under the influence of drugs. "Now the stupefying charges have all gone, the Crown can't establish these young men were ever in a stupor. We're getting closer to reality and truth here,” said defence lawyer Paul Davison QC. But prosecutor Paul Hamlin told the jury in his closing address that Sturm was a sexual predator who knew a cocktail of mind-altering substances, including drugs and alcohol, was needed to bring the men under his control, repeating a pattern of choosing young heterosexual males and building a rapport with them. Mr Hamlin said all four men said they were heterosexual who in their right minds would not have had homosexual sex with Sturm.    
Disclaimer:This page displays a version of the article with all formatting and images removed. It was harvested automatically and some text content may not have been fully captured correctly: access this content at your own risk. A copy of the full article is available (off-line) at the Lesbian and Gay Archives of New Zealand. This online version is provided for personal research and review and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of If you have queries or concerns about this article please email us
Reproduction note:Just before closed in May 2017, the website owners wrote this article about reproducing content from the website: "our work has always been available for glbti people to use and all we ask is that you not plagiarise it... if you use it anywhere please attribute it to and where there is an authors name attached please acknowledge that writer."