Article Title:DOMA's death: what does it mean for bi-national couples?
Author or Credit:Jacqui Stanford
Published on:27th June 2013 - 10:12 am
NDHA link:
Note that the National Library of New Zealand (NDHA) website uses both cookies and frames. The first time you click on a link it first may take you to the archived front page of Close the window and try again. This is because the NDHA website uses cookies and you cannot access an indiviual page without visiting the front page first
Story ID:13565
Text:File Photo The dumping of the Defense of Marriage Act has massive ramifications for the estimated 28,500 bi-national gay couples who have been excluded from immigration benefits in the US. The Act disallowed the federal government from recognising same-sex marriages between American citizens and foreigners. Now it has been struck down, as the Huffington Post explains: “Wednesday's Supreme Court ruling doesn't entirely fix the problem -- couples must be married rather than partners, and must travel to a state that allows same-sex marriage if they don't live in one -- but it's still a major victory for LGBT rights.” Basically the repeal of DOMA will permit legally married LGBT United States citizens and ‘Lawful Permanent Residents’ to sponsor their foreign-born spouses for green cards. The ruling has reportedly already helped one binational same-sex couple: an immigration judge has just halted the deportation of a man married to a US citizen on Wednesday. In the face of DOMA, many couples have chosen to move to countries where their relationship is recognised, such as New Zealand. “Any American would agree that being forced to choose between your homeland and your loved one is a heartbreaking choice,” American Immigration Lawyers Association President Laura Lichter said in a statement. The advocacy group Immigration Equality will push the Obama administration to quickly implement the ruling so same-sex couples can receive green cards. Jacqui Stanford - 27th June 2013    
Disclaimer:This page displays a version of the article with all formatting and images removed. It was harvested automatically and some text content may not have been fully captured correctly: access this content at your own risk. A copy of the full article is available (off-line) at the Lesbian and Gay Archives of New Zealand. This online version is provided for personal research and review and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of If you have queries or concerns about this article please email us
Reproduction note:Just before closed in May 2017, the website owners wrote this article about reproducing content from the website: "our work has always been available for glbti people to use and all we ask is that you not plagiarise it... if you use it anywhere please attribute it to and where there is an authors name attached please acknowledge that writer."