Article Title:Manukau Sex Work Bill: Sent to Coventry?
Category:Comment
Author or Credit:Craig Young
Published on:18th June 2013 - 08:45 am
Published by:GayNZ.com
Internet Archive link:https://web.archive.org/web/20170423044601/http://www.gaynz.com/articles/publish/31/article_13510.php
NDHA link:http://ndhadeliver.natlib.govt.nz/ArcAggregator/arcView/frameView/IE22324532/http://www.gaynz.com/articles/publish/31/article_13510.php
Note that the National Library of New Zealand (NDHA) website uses both cookies and frames. The first time you click on a link it first may take you to the archived front page of gaynz.com. Close the window and try again. This is because the NDHA website uses cookies and you cannot access an indiviual page without visiting the front page first
Story ID:13510
Text:Why has the Local Government and Environment select committee's report on the ill-fated Manukau City (Regulating Prostitution in Specified Places) been deferred until 30 September? Possibly, it is because the select committee itself is in conflict over whether or not to further progress the bill. In essence, it is not too dissimilar to the earlier Manukau City (Control of Street Prostitution) Bill, earlier rejected by Parliament, and differs only in title. It still contains the same breaches of the Bill of Rights Act 1990, still contains the same excessive penalties against street sex workers and their clients, and still carries the same risk of diverting street sex workers to unsafe and remote working areas as has happened with the Summary Offences Act 1988 in New South Wales and the Sarkozy-era Domestic Security Act 2003 in France. Why might this be the case? Admittedly, Family First and its cronies did its job well in mobilising individual support at the select committee stage, albeit merely with pro forma recommended copies with no substantive evidence grounding their 'case' against street sex work in Manukau City (and further abroad) other than anecdotal instances of 'public nuisance.' Even Family First's own submission was mediocre and impressionistic rather than based on any real or substantive 'objections' to street sex work. However, while submissions that supported the Prostitution Reform Act's status quo were fewer, corporate and organisational submissions tended to be weightier and carried more medical, social scientific and legislative evidence that overseas antisoliciting bills, as well as New Zealand's own past antisoliciting elements of pre-reform sex work prohibition only acted to endanger New Zealand sex workers lives and health. Effectively, they seem to have provided a handy counterweight to the puff populist lightweight submissions from supporters of the Manukau bill. I suspect that this is the dilemma which now faces the Local Government and Environment select committee in this context- "public opinion" (?) versus professional evidence to the contrary. For whatever reason, though, this wretched bill has been deferred. However, this gives us further time to lobby the Local Government and Environment select committee members and other MPs, establish an organisation to counter Family First's hijacking of the select committee phase of this bill, encourage opposed organisations to reiterate their select committee condemnation of the dangers of this bill, encourage media outlets to do further background research on the hazards of overseas anti-soliciting bills, make our collective opposition known to the Auckland City Council, and warn the latter that we will not tolerate any further moves that endanger the lives and health of some of our most vulnerable LGBT community members. As well as that, as I have said previously, we need to move to establish concrete assistance to assist street sex workers beyond provision of safe sex materials and occupational health and safety alone and give them far more life opportunities and choices than they currently have. We can no longer afford to let this issue go unanswered and neglected. Recommended: Manukau City (Regulation of Prostitution in Specified Places) Bill: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/local/2010/0197/latest/DLM3177401.html‎ Parliament: Manukau City (Regulation of Prostitution in Specified Places) Bill: http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/Legislation/Bills/b/1/2/00DBHOH_BILL10290_1-Manukau Craig Young - 18th June 2013    
Disclaimer:This page displays a version of the GayNZ.com article with all formatting and images removed. It was harvested automatically and some text content may not have been fully captured correctly: access this content at your own risk. A copy of the full article is available (off-line) at the Lesbian and Gay Archives of New Zealand. This online version is provided for personal research and review and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of PrideNZ.com. If you have queries or concerns about this article please email us
Reproduction note:Just before GayNZ.com closed in May 2017, the website owners wrote this article about reproducing content from the website: "our work has always been available for glbti people to use and all we ask is that you not plagiarise it... if you use it anywhere please attribute it to GayNZ.com and where there is an authors name attached please acknowledge that writer."